Theory for hackspaces: Difference between revisions
m →Management/Business: fixed formatting |
zizek argues that happiness is unethical |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hackers usually focus on 'getting things done', without too much discussion, and the hackspace rules say that [[talk is cheap]], which might | Hackers usually focus on 'getting things done', without too much discussion, and the hackspace rules say that [[talk is cheap]], which might appear to devalue communication. | ||
If you think we should talk about something, please add your suggestions to this page with a brief explanation of why the text/issue should interest us, in relation to hackspace. | |||
== Why bother with theory == | == Why bother with theory == | ||
It is important to set the limits of what we can talk about, because what we do is rooted in how we talk. | It is important to set the limits of what we can talk about, because what we do is rooted in how we talk. | ||
With a good foundation in theory, the value of the hackspace might be increased. This page is written in the hope that it will lead to greater membership contributions, motivate more participation, and lead to more collaboration. Also, we might work out how to respond appropriately to conflict. | With a good foundation in theory, the value of the hackspace might be increased. This page is written in the hope that it will lead to greater membership contributions, motivate more participation, and lead to more collaboration. Also, we might work out how to respond appropriately to conflict and how to communicate better. | ||
Ideally, theory brings us together and does not divide us. | |||
== How theory relates to hackspace == | |||
Hackspace exists broadly to empower people to make things, and provides shared resources that enable people get on with what wants to be done. Some things need communication, but if we discuss everything at length before acting, then little change occurs. Hackspace offers the opportunity to both discuss things and to act together in the same community. The outcome of a discussion is often an essay, a video, a book, or a wiki. | |||
== See Also == | |||
* [[Life Hacking]] and [[Life skills for the hackspace]]. | |||
== Suggested videos for a reading group == | |||
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U88jj6PSD7w Why be happy when you could be interesting?] - argues that happiness is an unethical category. | |||
== Suggested books for a reading group == | == Suggested books for a reading group == | ||
=== Critical theory === | === Critical theory === | ||
Revision as of 18:55, 25 January 2013
Hackers usually focus on 'getting things done', without too much discussion, and the hackspace rules say that talk is cheap, which might appear to devalue communication.
If you think we should talk about something, please add your suggestions to this page with a brief explanation of why the text/issue should interest us, in relation to hackspace.
Why bother with theory
It is important to set the limits of what we can talk about, because what we do is rooted in how we talk.
With a good foundation in theory, the value of the hackspace might be increased. This page is written in the hope that it will lead to greater membership contributions, motivate more participation, and lead to more collaboration. Also, we might work out how to respond appropriately to conflict and how to communicate better.
Ideally, theory brings us together and does not divide us.
How theory relates to hackspace
Hackspace exists broadly to empower people to make things, and provides shared resources that enable people get on with what wants to be done. Some things need communication, but if we discuss everything at length before acting, then little change occurs. Hackspace offers the opportunity to both discuss things and to act together in the same community. The outcome of a discussion is often an essay, a video, a book, or a wiki.
See Also
Suggested videos for a reading group
- Why be happy when you could be interesting? - argues that happiness is an unethical category.
Suggested books for a reading group
Critical theory
A Hacker Manifesto, by Wark
Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization, by Galloway
Cultural studies
The Culture of Technology
Cognitive science
In Over Our Heads - suggests why so much of this stuff goes over our heads.
Management/Business
The Handbook of Large Group Methods - methods to organise activity that can engage really large groups of people (with lots of case studies).
Open Space Technology, or Expanding Our Now - a way of inviting unstructured and self-organising events that flow.
Assertiveness and Diversity - uses NLP to convince the reader that the best way to achieve diversity is to promote assertiveness in organisations.
Activism
Change the world without taking power - an emotional scream, or plea, to organise in a non-hierarchical way.