Neurocognitive Research Team: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* unscrutinised fact-glancing: creating unwarranted acceptance | * unscrutinised fact-glancing: creating unwarranted acceptance | ||
* insecurity exploits: isolating exploitable fears with a classical good-cop/bad-cop technique during seemingly normal conversation | * insecurity exploits: isolating exploitable fears with a classical good-cop/bad-cop technique during seemingly normal conversation | ||
* | * Small society symbolic interactionism within the hackspace: [[RedRabbit]] subliminal symbol planting project |
Latest revision as of 11:55, 20 July 2015
Sensory acquisition disruption tools for immediate and post-suggestion brainjacking: -
- multi-sensory misdirection
- phonological loop blocking
- visuo-spatial pad scribbling (temporary emotional stress techniques)
- Episodic buffer collapse: immediate-to-short-term memory techniques
- chemosensory perception injection - gustatory system triggers
- disconfirmation bias hooks - trojans for deeply-held belief systems
- crypto-cognitive-syntactiplasty - doubt manipulation with word and phrase munging
- Language invoked dysrationalia fixation via latent semantic analysis (LSA) techniques: using certain large texts and long audio recordings (> 5 minutes) to implant thought-germ seeds for later invocation
- neural fabric stitching and patching with subliminal associations
- unscrutinised fact-glancing: creating unwarranted acceptance
- insecurity exploits: isolating exploitable fears with a classical good-cop/bad-cop technique during seemingly normal conversation
- Small society symbolic interactionism within the hackspace: RedRabbit subliminal symbol planting project