Counting Poo: Difference between revisions

From Nottinghack Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Fowkc (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Fowkc (talk | contribs)
Added microphone/piezo results
Line 82: Line 82:
==Tested ideas==
==Tested ideas==


==Temperature==
===Temperature===
===Design===
====Design====
The basic circuit was a 10K thermistor and 10K resistor forming a potential divider. The voltage was measured with an oscilloscope/Arduino.
The basic circuit was a 10K thermistor and 10K resistor forming a potential divider. The voltage was measured with an oscilloscope/Arduino.
====Results====
====Results====
Line 99: Line 99:


===Microphone/Piezo===
===Microphone/Piezo===
 
''Note : The piezo sensor was discounted at an early stage due to low sensitivity to mild vibration.''
====Design====
A standard electret microphone amplifier circuit was built using a TL081 op-amp. The output waveform was measured with an oscilloscope.
====Results====
The circuit is capable of picking up the sound/vibration from a flush
====Conclusions====
While the principle of detection with sound/vibration is good, in practice the complexity of designing a robust solution renders this idea impractical.
[[Category:Projects]]
[[Category:Projects]]
[[Category:Projects (in progress)]]
[[Category:Projects (in progress)]]

Revision as of 12:11, 13 January 2014

Counting Poo
[[{{{image}}}|border|frameless|220px|center]]
Primary Contact Matt Little
Created {{{created}}}
Completed {{{completeddate}}}
Dormant {{{dormantdate}}}
Version {{{version}}}
Members {{{members}}}
Manufacturer {{{manufacturer}}}
Model {{{model}}}
Location [[{{{location}}}]]
GitHub / Repo {{{repo}}}
Status {{{status}}}
Type Undefined
Live Status {{{livestatus}}}
QR code

Outline

This is a project via Nicola Greene to assist International NGO, Water for People with their work in Uganda.

The NGO install latrines in various urban and rural areas in Uganda. They have been having an issue with the fill rates of the latrines and are wanting to get real data on the use of the latrines. This means recoding visits to the latrines and counting the number of flushes made. Knowledge of the volume and weight of the deposits made each visit would be an added bonus.

A good overview of the problem and project is available here: http://www.slideshare.net/NicolaGreene/nicola-greene-msc-introduction-slideshare-28634508 For more on why sanitation is important: http://www.wateraid.org/uk/what-we-do/the-crisis/sanitation?gclid=CNm0p7nz67sCFQPmwgodFRYAug

The device must be:

  • Robust
  • Easy to install on existing equipment
  • Low cost ($50-$200 budget per unit)

Hackday 11/1/14

Primary Objective:

  • Produce a prototype to monitor a 'flush' event and record that data.

Secondary Objectives:

  • Determine flush volume
  • Determine solid/liquid proportion in flush
  • Determine pit volume

Brainstormed ideas

Flush Sensing

Idea Description Advantages Disadvantages
Mechanical Flap A hinged/moving cover on the waste pipe outflow that is moved by a flush. Simple and robust.
Maintainable in-situ.
Low or zero power.
Risk of causing blockage.
Metallic components will corrode in high humidity/heat?
Beam break (across pipe) An IR/visible light beam is transmitted across the pipe. A flush breaks the beam. Cheap components
Solid-state solution
Waste on either transmitter or receiver will cause false readings
Reflective Sensor An IR/visible Tx/Rx pair is underneath the outflow pipe. The beam is reflected by a flush into the receiver. Cheap components
Solid-state solution
Can be "baffled" to stop waste interfering with sensing
Can waste be completely eliminated from getting in the way?
Temperature Sensor A temperature sensor (probably a thermistor) is mounted on/in the waste pipe. A flush changes the temperature. Cheap components
Solid-state solution
Not affected by buildup of waste (unless large amounts are present
Relies on temperature difference between waste and ambient pit temperature
May be too slow to react to changes
May have to be placed within flow, possible restriction/blockage
May require designing to be flush with pipe surface
Piezo/microphone Sensor A piezo or microphone is placed on the pipe. A flush causes vibrations that are picked up and amplified for sensing. Solid-state solution Requires significant analog circuitry for signal conditioning
Requires significant software for signal processing
Unknown effect of other vibration sources (e.g. nearby road)
Possible that waste on sensor will dampen/alter vibration characteristics
Moisture Sensor A moisture sensor is placed within the pipe. A flush changes the resistance of the sensor. Low cost, solid-state solution Has to be placed within flow, possible restriction/blockage
May require designing to be flush with pipe surface

Waste Volume Sensing

Ultrasonic Sensor An ultrasonic Tx/Rx pair placed on the pit lid will measure distance from lid to top-of-waste
With knowledge of the dimensions of the pit, this will allow volume calculation.
Non-contact, solid-state sensing Relatively high cost
Must be calibrate to pit dimensions for best data
Likely to be incompatible with "tiger worm tray" composting addition?
Resistive/Capacitive Sensor A series of sensors on a "pole" mounted vertically in the pit will be used to measure depth. Potential to be very simple, low-cost solution Sensors in contact with waste need to be protected against corrosion

Tested ideas

Temperature

Design

The basic circuit was a 10K thermistor and 10K resistor forming a potential divider. The voltage was measured with an oscilloscope/Arduino.

Results

A thermistor placed on the outside of the pipe is not suitable. The pipe conducts heat too slowly, and the heat transfer for one flush is very low.

A thermistor placed within the pipe (as flush to surface as possible) was more successful. A large voltage change was apparent when a flush occurred.

Conclusions

With careful design to mitigate risk of blockage due to obstruction in pipe, this method shows promise.

The requirement that there be a temperature difference between waste and ambient remains a concern.

This method may have to be used in conjunction with other sensors.

IR beam

Microphone/Piezo

Note : The piezo sensor was discounted at an early stage due to low sensitivity to mild vibration.

Design

A standard electret microphone amplifier circuit was built using a TL081 op-amp. The output waveform was measured with an oscilloscope.

Results

The circuit is capable of picking up the sound/vibration from a flush

Conclusions

While the principle of detection with sound/vibration is good, in practice the complexity of designing a robust solution renders this idea impractical.