Wall of Faces: Difference between revisions

From Nottinghack Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Marcus (talk | contribs)
some strong opposition (as you must already know)
Strong objections to some strong objections
Line 85: Line 85:


'''You already know this Wall of Faces will upset some regular users of the hackspace''' - These objections have already been expressed for a long time, so it's not clear why these elaborate (and apparently pointless) plans have been made.  Disputes like this are sapping energy from more worthwhile projects.
'''You already know this Wall of Faces will upset some regular users of the hackspace''' - These objections have already been expressed for a long time, so it's not clear why these elaborate (and apparently pointless) plans have been made.  Disputes like this are sapping energy from more worthwhile projects.
No, no, and no! These objections may have been expressed but that doesn't mean that everyone will agree. There is nothing wrong with elaborate and pointless plans and there is no energy being sapped from more worthwhile projects (otherwise we'd all be concentrating on, say, curing cancer would we not?) --[[User:Msemtd|Michael Erskine]] 08:21, 4 April 2012 (EST)


[[Category:Projects]]
[[Category:Projects]]
[[Category:Current Projects]]
[[Category:Current Projects]]

Revision as of 13:21, 4 April 2012

Overview

The wall of faces will have members' photos and names on it. They will light up if a member is within the space. This was started as we grew and people could not put names to faces of members. Obviously a high-tech touch has been added.

The wall will comprise of a number of boxes. Each box will have the members photo and name. The boxes will be laser cut and all fit together to build a whole wall. Each box will also contain a circuit board. This will have LED backlighting and a microcontroller (probably an ATtiny48/85). When a member is in the space (via their RFID tag) then their image will light up. Members do not swipe out, so at the end of every day then all the backlighting will reset. This will give a record of who was in the space that day.

This will probably be in the form of a kit which members get the chance to build - including laser cut pieces and soldering the board.

Boxes

The boxes will be 60(h) x 60(l) x 30mm(w).
The design was created using BoxMaker.
More on making project boxes is here http://support.ponoko.com/entries/20344437-laser-cut-project-box-tutorial.
The initial prototype is here:



Circuit

Code

Simple code - when a command comes through (a unique identifier) then the light swicthes ON (also can send an OFF command).

Firmware available here
https://github.com/NottingHack/Wall-of-Faces

I2C Command structure

Need to define the command system for turning on and off the RGB led's
Needs to be simple so that changes down the line to add more functionality are only needed at the Main Controller rather than re-flashing every module
May follow BlinkM command structure http://thingm.com

Using the 10bit addressing with I2C
http://www.i2c-bus.org/addressing/10-bit-addressing/
Standard TWI/I2C on avr uses 7 bit address space this allows for 0-127 devices on a single bus, its possible to use a 10 bit address space but its going to need some custom code for both the ATmega328 and the ATtiny85 :(

Main Controller

A controller will be required to take the info from gatekeeper (which knows when an RFID tag has been read) and output a command to turn on the correct box.

The Gatekeeper process on Holly will send ON commands with unique member id's
Posible a nanode with NanodeMQTT to decode the MQTT and then send commands out via the I2C bus.

Cost

  • ATtiny85 from RS ATTINY85V-10PU 696-2339P
    • 10+ £1.74
    • 25+ £1.59
  • ATtiny45 from RS ATTINY45V-10PU 696-2320P
    • 10+ £1.38
    • 25+ £1.26
  • RGB led's
  • Headers
  • PCB
  • Capacitor
  • Transistor
  • Wood
    • 2 per box's per A4 sheet aprox
  • Laser time

Strong objections

It reinforces feelings of social exclusion - A wall of white male faces is inevitable, at least in the short term, and this will evoke feelings of exclusion. To have a diverse community, we need to make people feel they belong, and a Wall of Faces is unhelpful here.

It contributes to an ego-rich environment - Where people project their egos into the space, and pat themselves on the back for doing it in an elaborate way.

It is not appropriate for our environment - A wall of mugshots is typical on a school, university, or 'rugby club' wall. The hackspace should appeal to people who want to get away from the conventions of institutions like this.

You already know this Wall of Faces will upset some regular users of the hackspace - These objections have already been expressed for a long time, so it's not clear why these elaborate (and apparently pointless) plans have been made. Disputes like this are sapping energy from more worthwhile projects.

No, no, and no! These objections may have been expressed but that doesn't mean that everyone will agree. There is nothing wrong with elaborate and pointless plans and there is no energy being sapped from more worthwhile projects (otherwise we'd all be concentrating on, say, curing cancer would we not?) --Michael Erskine 08:21, 4 April 2012 (EST)